Numbers 14-15

Chapter 14- Because of the bad report the spies gave, the people complain that it would have been better to die as slaves in Egypt than to be killed by the native people in Canaan, and begin to make plans to return to Egypt. This makes God angry, and he threatens to kill them all. Moses talks him out of wholesale slaughter, but God does say that none of the complainers will get to enter the promised land. He will force them to stay in the desert for 40 years until all of the complainers die, then their children can enter the promised land. The spies who gave the bad report are killed. Some of the people try to take the promised land anyway, but the natives repel their attack.

Yesterday I compared God to a bad parent, but today I think he sounds more like a bratty child. (I’m thinking along the lines of King Joffrey, for any GoT fans out there.) When his people dare to question his plans, he throws an almighty fit and threatens to “strike them with pestilence and disinherit them.” Only when Moses deftly strokes God’s ego and reminds Him to think of his reputation does God relent, but not without substituting other punishment. It’s not so much that killing your chosen people is wrong, but just imagine what the Egyptians will think! Better to let them rot in the desert than to kill them outright.

Image

I haven’t watched the show, but I’m about halfway through the second book and I hate this kid. From what I know so far, Joffrey=the god of the Old Testament seems an apt comparison.

It’s interesting that the people complain, “If only we had died in Egypt! Or if only we had died in this wilderness! Why has the Lord brought us to this land to fall by the sword, that our wives and children should become victims?”  and God’s response is to give them what they wanted: a death in the wilderness. But back in chapter 11, Moses complains, “I am not able to bear all these people alone because the burden is too heavy for me. If You treat me like this, please kill me here and now– if I have found favor in Your sight– and do not let me see my wretchedness!” and God’s response is to actually help Moses. That Yahweh is an unpredictable fellow.

Chapter 15- Instructions are given for making offerings once the people enter the promised land. A man is found gathering sticks on the Sabbath, and God orders the people to stone him.

Why is God giving instructions for offerings in the promised land when he just finished telling the people they won’t get to enter it? It will be 40 years before anyone can, so what are the odds people will remember this rule by then? It feels like God is adding insult to injury, holding it over their heads that they don’t get to go.

The instructions for making offerings after one has sinned unintentionally are repeated here, but this time punishment is listed for those who sin on purpose. Verses 30-31, ” But the person who does anything presumptuously, whether he is native born or a stranger, that one brings reproach on the Lord, and he shall be cut off from among his people. Because he has despised the word of the Lord, and has broken His commandment, that person shall be completely cut off; his guilt shall be upon him.”

Which seems strange enough, but then it is followed by this story about a guy gathering sticks on the Sabbath. It is described as such: “Now while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath day.” It doesn’t specify whether he was an Israelite who should have known the rules about keeping the Sabbath holy, or if he was just some random dude they happened across. It sounds to me like this could possibly have been one of those “unintentional” sins, but God decrees that “The man must surely be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp.”

First of all, “stone him with stones”? Duh. What else would you stone someone with?

Second, are you kidding me? In the preceding verses, an accidental sin could be atoned, a purposeful sin results in becoming an outcast. So if this sin was neither accidental nor intentional, what other type of sin was there? What kind of sin could this possibly have been to deserve a stoning?!? The guy was just picking up some firewood on a Saturday, and he was brutalized for it!

I think the whole of Israel was abjectly morally bankrupt. If you see someone gathering firewood, and the voices you perceive as coming from the sky tell you to kill that person, the moral action is to tell the voices to fuck right off. You don’t get your buddies together with a big pile of rocks and make an event of it!

I’ve decided not to include any images of stoning, as it’s a disturbing and brutal method of execution. If you’re interested though, this page “Anatomy of a stoning” in modern Iran is is informative without being too graphic.

The long and short of it here is that stoning is barbaric, and God’s an asshole for condoning it as punishment for any “sin”, let alone something as harmless as picking up sticks on the wrong day of the week.

One more thing I’d like to briefly discuss: God tells the Israelites to put blue tassels on their clothing as a reminder of the commandments he has given them, “that you may not follow the harlotry to which your own heart and your own eyes are inclined.” This is something that really bothers me about religion; God is constantly reminding humans of how inferior we are, and actively trying to make us feel like crap for being the way he made us. (Assuming we were created, which I don’t believe, but I hope you see the point I’m getting at.)

I’ll leave you with this fantastic quote from Dan Barker, president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation:

The very concept of sin comes from the bible. Christianity offers to solve a problem of its own making! Would you be thankful to a person who cut you with a knife in order to sell you a bandage?

Advertisements

About Essential Everyday Pineapple

Crazy cat lady extraordinaire, liberal, atheist, feminist, vegetarian, engineering student with an art degree. Essential Everyday Pineapple is just a phrase from a random word generator that had a nice ring to it. What? Blog names are tough.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Numbers 14-15

  1. Emily says:

    Christianity “defines” sin, but I wouldn’t say it creates the problem of sin in the first place. Without religion, non-religious people still have a sense of right and wrong and seek justice when something is clearly wrong. In a world of sensible atheists, there would still be a justice system – child rapists would still be hated and bigots would be frowned upon. Where is the moral code coming from? So we don’t call wrong attitudes/actions “sins” anymore, but it wouldn’t make the wrong-doing disappear. Paul in the New Testament describes this in Romans (2:14-15). I think the knife analogy could be revised with an analogy of a human with an illness; the ignorant man would know he’s somehow sick, but may not know what it’s called, but a doctor would say “this is what you have and here’s how it’s cured.” If the doctor doesn’t exist, it doesn’t change the fact that the man is still sick. Just my thoughts. Thanks for your candidness to share yours.

    • I agree that people do bad things like rape, murder, etc, regardless of if we name those actions “sins.”
      What I was trying to get at, and I’m sorry if I didn’t express myself well, is that the Bible wants us to think that harmless parts of human nature are sins. Things like our sexual desires, especially for homosexuals, or or a natural tendency to ask questions and doubt God, or the need to get some chores done on a Saturday.
      There are people, I used to be one of them, who spend a lot of time feeling guilty and dirty and asking God to forgive them of things that are perceived as bad only because the Bible says so, not because they cause inherent harm to the person or those around them. That’s what the knife/bandage analogy is getting at.

  2. ranndumm69 says:

    Luckily, we can rest assured that most all of this nonsense is fiction. The multi-personality driven Yahweh is a result of a multi source (or myth) compilation by later redactors…but what fun it is to read!

  3. I just have to say that I too am halfway through the second GoT book and haven’t seen the show. Now I will never think of Joffrey as anything other than Angry OT God. Thanks for the laugh.

  4. Pingback: Deuteronomy 11-13 | Essential Everyday Pineapple

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s